Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-05-06 04:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #3776 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3776 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[French politics / My Little Pony]
__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 56 secrets from Secret Submission Post #541.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 10:56 am (UTC)(link)Well, yes, because you've defined porn as inherently objectifying. I'm not sure why you're asking people to provide you with counterexamples when according to your personal (some might say idiosyncratic) definition of porn, you'll either categorize any suggestions as not objectifying and therefore not porn, or disagree with the person making the suggestion and agree that it's porn, but only because you view it as objectifying.
That may sound like a fun time to you, but I'm hard-pressed to see why anyone would choose to join you in this little game.