case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-05-06 04:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #3776 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3776 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[French politics / My Little Pony]


__________________________________________________


09.






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 56 secrets from Secret Submission Post #541.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 10:56 am (UTC)(link)
I'm someone who believes all porn objectifies someone, and objectification-free porn basically isn't porn...I have a hard time imagining a "porn" that is not about objectification and fetishization.

Well, yes, because you've defined porn as inherently objectifying. I'm not sure why you're asking people to provide you with counterexamples when according to your personal (some might say idiosyncratic) definition of porn, you'll either categorize any suggestions as not objectifying and therefore not porn, or disagree with the person making the suggestion and agree that it's porn, but only because you view it as objectifying.

That may sound like a fun time to you, but I'm hard-pressed to see why anyone would choose to join you in this little game.