[ SECRET POST #3778 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3778 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________


09.






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #541.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not saying there are no differences whatsoever. obviously there are significant differences. Fascism is an ideology, the Nazis were a particular fascist political party and regime, neo-Nazis are militant extreme-right fascists who invoke Nazi imagery.

I'm asking about the political significance of those distinctions, because anon's post implied that the distinction was important and eliding it was particularly bad from a contemporary political perspective.

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

[(Anonymous)]

It is technically incorrect and there are several things that make these distinctions an important matter... IF you're talking about this in a scholarly or scientific discussion. But I personally agree that in colloquial speech, calling them all Nazis is serviceable enough.

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

[diet_poison]

This pretty much.