[ SECRET POST #3790 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3790 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #543.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

I believe it since they said they didn't specify their age at the time so people were assuming they were an adult

DA

[(Anonymous)]

It sounds fake to me because the way it's phrased "when they were 14" makes it sound like something that happened years ago. And years ago, people didn't call other people pedophiles for having crushes on fictional teenagers. It just didn't happen, and especially not to a dogpiling degree. If one odd person did it, they would be more likely to get dogpiled by everyone else for making such a stupid accusation.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

Sorry, closed my italics tag wrong.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

It would have been 3-4 years ago. The big "Sherlock/Watson shippers are pedo, but not Watson/Sherlock shippers" wank started two years ago. So that's not an unreasonable timeframe.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

I though the whole "A/B is a completely different pairing to B/A, because yaoi tropes" was a thing of the past, but this is the second reference I've seen to it.