[ SECRET POST #3791 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3791 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Americans]


__________________________________________________



03.
[veep]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Elementary]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Ben 10]


__________________________________________________



06.
[World of Warcraft]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Shane and Ryan, Buzzfeed Unsolved]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #543.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[soldatsasha]

Pretty normal?

One of my exes used 'fag' as an endearment.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[thewakokid]

Ah, excellent. Then I am perfectly normal and acceptable.

And I am Happy to hear that and not at all disappointed because it means I'm not special or anything.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[(Anonymous)]

Or you and SoldatSasha are borh abnormal.

One other person does not make a norm.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[thewakokid]

True, Sash is an interesting person. Any Normie's on here do the same thing?

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[(Anonymous)]

How is "normie" defined, anyway?

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[thewakokid]

People who are not exactly like me.

A duck is someone who is almost exactly like me.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[(Anonymous)]

Go back to your pond and get off the internet, then.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[thewakokid]

Duck itnthat was supposed to be CUCK. Fucking auto correct.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[soldatsasha]

Bruh you've asked a lot of things here and the answer has always been that you are normal and acceptable. In fact, you're more than acceptable to me, you're downright swell~ <3

But if you'd like, next time I can join our overly dramatic anon posters and tell you what an a monster you are for *gasp* sharing in-jokes with your girlfriend or whatever.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[(Anonymous)]

It's overly dramatic to find an annoying person annoying?

No one called him a monster. Saying that the suggestion that a person's behavior might not be normal is equivalent to calling them a monster is pretty overdramatic itself.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[thewakokid]

Ah, that's sweet, but no. It would feel fake.

Thanks for the kindness

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[(Anonymous)]

Not "useless druggie gangster who does weird things with paper towels?" There's a lot of things I'd have gone for before Fag.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[thewakokid]

I was thinking that. Like its an opportunity to be creative with your insults. Fag seems somewhat pedestrian to me.

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[soldatsasha]

He was maybe not very creative. :3

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[(Anonymous)]

What's this thing with paper towels?

Re: Offensive but loving petnames?

[soldatsasha]

They're talking about this thread. (warning: TMI about masturbation)

http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1613584.html?thread=959254288#cmt959254288