Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-05-22 07:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3792 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3792 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #543.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-22 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-22 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 01:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Some people have much lower 'crush' threshold than other people. They get infatuated much more easily even with real people. Just like sex drive, there's a huge range. So yeah, plenty of people get crushes on fictional characters, especially if those are characters they find very attractive or feel like they understand on some deep level.
But there's also the fact that people use 'crush' to mean different things. I would, for example, never use the word to describe anyone I had serious romantic+sexual feelings toward whether or not a relationship ever developed, bc for me that's more than a crush. For me a crush is 'haha he's pretty cute' or 'haha yeah I get a little flustered when he talks to me'. But other people would use it in the opposite way, to mean someone they DO have real feelings for.
I mean, I guess since people fall in love with fictional characters and marry them on the astral plane, pretend they're having sex with them rather than their real life partner, spend months or years writing fanfic and maintaining fan pages to them, etc. I don't see how character crushes are somehow not understandable?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 01:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 02:57 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 06:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 12:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 12:58 am (UTC)(link)And sometimes it's not even so much the character itself as it is more appreciating certain qualities in fictional characters that you'd like to find in a real person someday.
Or maybe you just think they look good, or something like that :p.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 01:11 am (UTC)(link)Or sometimes it's not even that, you just find something about them that is hot. Like there are fictional crushes I have that I would NEVER want a part of in reality but god it's fun to think about.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 06:31 am (UTC)(link)Yup, all of this.
I was rewatching the first few eps of The Office (US) the other day, and it got to the point where I announced out loud to no one: "Jim Halpert is my ideal boyfriend. It's not even fair what a perfect boyfriend Jim would be."
Damon Salvatore OTOH? Hot as fuck, but in reality? Oh hell no.
Both dudes very enjoyable to watch, and think about, and drool over, though .
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 02:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-23 06:44 am (UTC)(link)Characters are almost always interesting to an unrealistic degree. Plus, characters are part of narratives, and I think most people's minds are extremely drawn to narratives (in the sense that our minds try to construct narratives for our own experiences in order to understand them), so I think it makes sense that we are attracted to characters, whose lives and personalities genuinely do have a narrative structure to them.