[ SECRET POST #3792 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3792 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #543.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Probably? And like I said, I would totally still watch a female Doctor (if they didn't fucking butcher the character in doing so), but I really do have concerns. Especially considering peoples' reactions to Missy.

[(Anonymous)]

That would be the butchering of the character. To do so would butcher the character; do you finally get it?

[(Anonymous)]

*shrug* I like Missy. I didn't particularly like Simm!Master. I don't feel either of them are written too differently to be honest. Both are a little off the deep end, both have a thing for the Doctor. So I don't personally consider Missy 'butchering' the character that was the Master anymore than Simm!Master was different than Roger Delgado or Anthony Ainley. All of the Doctors themselves, the portrayals have been varying even if core beliefs (protection) remain the same. I wouldn't object to a woman Doctor as long as she still had those 'core' Doctor beliefs and as long as they wrote her as The Doctor and not, A Woman Doctor.

[(Anonymous)]

Well that would just make her Romana or Sarah Jane, so, we're back to butchering the character again.

DA

[(Anonymous)]

"It's butchering a character because I don't like it" has been your entire argument.