case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-05-27 03:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #3797 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3797 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #544.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Vent thread

(Anonymous) 2017-05-27 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I liked Ebert because he tended to try to consider what a movie was trying to do and then evaluate how successful it was in that regard. He wasn't automatically dismissive of action, animation, scifi, kids' movies, and so on. He was aslo fucking hilarious sometimes (see: his review of North).

Siskel and Roper came off as critics who mostly only like certain types of movies and judge films based on whether they fit into those types.