Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-05-28 03:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #3798 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3798 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #544.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-28 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-28 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)From a normative point of view, I agree that it's important to do something to deal with the issue, but I don't think it's necessarily deadly for the basic concept, for all the reasons I said above. I don't think the genre is intrinsically or unrecoverably racist. It's a solvable problem.
From a positive point of view, I'm not sure how much of an impact it actually has on a film's financial prospects. I wish it had more of an impact! I think it's good that films try to deal with these issues. But I have to be honest that I haven't really seen any evidence that politically incorrect films are more likely to fail at the box office. I think mostly filmmakers try to grapple with those issues because they believe it's important to do so themselves.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-28 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-28 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)That does clarify things.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-29 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)SIGH.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-29 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)Assuming they're sincere, wanna bet they're totally fine with problematic elements in their favorite franchise because ~reasons~?