[ SECRET POST #3804 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3804 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Chris Pratt]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Banlieue 13/District B13]


__________________________________________________



05.
[American Gods]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Stephen Fry]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug and Cat Noir]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #545.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

below

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

Pearl Mackie's hair improved markedly tonight.

The rest was shit.

Moffat mawkishness about cool moments and no plot.

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

I was pretty sure this episode wasn't written by Moffat but you made me check... and guess what, this episode wasn't written by Moffat.

0/10

These anti-Moffat trolls are getting out of hand.

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

Who is the showrunner and does script work on every script? Let me check...

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, just like you guys blame Moffat and only Moffat for everything on Sherlock's episodes written by Gattis when both are showrunners. It's not like you have a hate boner for the guy, right? *rollseyes*

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

People are pretty willing to criticize Gattis, though

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

I blamed everyone on Sherlock, including Mark Thompson, George Entwistle, Tim Davie, and Tony Hall. Especially them.

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT but he's still the dang ol' showrunner. The chain of authorship is more complicated, and really shouldn't be stated conclusively without some kind of specific account of how the episode came into existence. But it's totally valid to trace elements of Moffat's general approach and style even in episodes that he didn't personally wrote. In the same way that we can talk about RTD-era characteristics in episodes RTD didn't write personally, or Cartmellian styles in episodes Cartmel didn't write, or about the hallmarks of the style of any other script editor or showrunner in the history of Doctor Who.

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

Moffat's big thing is defeating an enemy with magical thinking, and this was literally magical thinking defeating the monks. The timey-wimeyness of the Doctor giving Bill pictures of her mother is pretty Moffat too.

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

If you did some research you would know that the plot for these episodes was originally Harness idea. They tied Moffat and Whithouse episodes because they thought having a three-parter was a cool idea.

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

And thus we come to the big fault. Moffat thought something was a cool idea and smooshed stuff together. That is exactly what is being complained about, stuff smooshed together by Showrunner Moffat for the sake of a cool idea.

Re: Doctor Who spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

Haven't watched it yet but I'm starting to wonder if I should just skip it and wait to binge the rest of the season.

I love Bill but the episodes have been struggling to hold my interest otherwise. There hasn't been one episode that's really stood out to me.