[ SECRET POST #3805 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3805 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #545.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Theory about the book clubs low participation

[(Anonymous)]

That is exactly it. It is the same reason we all try to start new discussion threads in replies instead of adding on to an existing one to properly thread discussion. Everyone wants to be the decider and nobody wants to be a contributor. Same reason that someone threw a paddie about getting a different for of voting, and threw another paddie when that new voting didn't produce their book as a winner. If they don't get their way, they pet their lip and do nothing.

I already wrote my answer to the book club thread, and I read the book.

Re: Theory about the book clubs low participation

[(Anonymous)]

I have actually not seen anyone throw a fit except the anon who claimed every other anon was the same person and then accused that alleged one person of being 'a whiny bitch' multiple times, because that alleged one person wanted to change the voting system and then that alleged one person's book didn't win the poll.

Which was complete bullshit, of course.

I don't know what you mean about the threads???

Re: Theory about the book clubs low participation

[(Anonymous)]

DA

From the tone of their post, I think the bitchy anon you're talking about is the same one you're replying to.