case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-06-08 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3809 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3809 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Solstice]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Martin Starr, Spider-Man: Homecoming]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[MacGyver (2016)]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #545.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-06-08 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay but here is a serious point to be made off of it - Monster is not a documentary, and thus it is a piece of fiction, one based on true events, but still fiction. People are less likely to be outraged by it, because we have learned from various fiction, what types of narratives to expect, and "sympathetic killer" is an old trope - and one Monster plays into. People view and judge Monster as fiction, because that's what it is. It is not necessarily a matter of not telling real life from fiction, but in fact, separating "fiction based on truth" into its own category - one that the tropes of fiction like M or Sweeney Todd are influencing more than real life morals. This may be right or wrong, but it is a different issue.