case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-06-10 04:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #3811 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3811 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[resized, not a repeat]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #546.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
thewakokid: (Default)

[personal profile] thewakokid 2017-06-10 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
No good reason I would say, there sure as hell is a reason but there's no goo reason. This gender divide can be a weapon. If it's just "This cover makes me feel bad" you got nothing to throw at your opponents, but if it's "This cover is gendered violence, it's a misogynistic attack on me an mine, and it's the duty of every right minded person to defend me and mine from misogyny" well, then you're armed for bear, aren't you. You call someone an ass-hole cause they upset you, no fucks will be given, but you call someone a misogynist, and you have allies, you have righteousness, you have a bludgeon to bring down on your enemies. That right there is a compelling reason to bring gender into it.

Its possible I'm just a cynical fuck, but this really is the impression I get with most internet arguments, it comes down to who can grab the social bludgeon first and hardest.

(Anonymous) 2017-06-11 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
Fair enough. But when people grab at gender when it isn't relevant then it just cheapens what actual sexism is.