case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-06-17 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #3818 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3818 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Parks and Recreation]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Grand Tour, Richard Hammond]


__________________________________________________



05.
(character from the movie The Babadook)


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Mummy (2017 reboot)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Kemono Friends]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #547.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: do transtrenders actually exist?

(Anonymous) 2017-06-18 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it feels like the biggest debate within community is what those labels mean so you've got once side who wants to expand the definition of man and woman and another who feels like that's a lost cause so creating more identities is the way to go. So you get both sides with different definitions of the same word yelling at each other because their definitions don't match.

There's obviously way more to it, but that how I feel like that's the biggest issue.

Re: do transtrenders actually exist?

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2017-06-18 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Saying it's all about "what those labels mean" is a luxury of having one's head firmly up one's asshole and only dealing with this subject online. My three biggest concerns are psychological treatment, violence/harassment, and workplace discrimination. I don't get fantasy "trend points" for being openly queer in any of these areas.