Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-22 06:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #3823 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3823 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. http://i.imgur.com/GZmEnmQ.jpg
[Passengers, linked for/OP warned for partial nudity]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #547.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-23 06:22 am (UTC)(link)I will say, however, that back a couple of years ago there was a bit of fan wank that got pretty out of hand, where a small but vocal group of johnlockers got overly mobbish in their dislike of toplock. But as OTT as things got at the time, even most of this vocal group weren't going as far as equating toplock with pedophilia. Most of them were arguing that a particular type of toplock (i.e. the Dark Fuck Prince trope) was squicky. A few conflated the DFP trope with rape and felt it was Wrong. A smaller number still conflated all toplock with the DFP trope, and therefore seemed to feel that all toplock was squicky and/or Wrong. A few of them did accuse a specific fanartist of drawing pedophilic toplock fanart (John was distinctly aged down in a lot of the artist's fanart, but none of it was overtly pedophilic). In short: it was a messy time in the fandom, and people were being reactionary asshats, but the kind of trollishness that OP seems to be describing in their secret seems even more OTT and absurd than the worst of what I saw during the height of the bottomlock-vs-toplock wank.
no subject