Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-23 06:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #3824 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3824 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[BoJack Horseman]
__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[Horizon Zero Dawn]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for possible discussion of harassment/sexual assault?]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

(Bill Cosby and Keshia Knight Pulliam)
__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for discussion of harassment/cyberbulling, abortion, child sexual abuse]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #547.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-24 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)I agree about his commitment being useless, but isn't that what heroes do? The do the right thing, as they see it, even if it won't achieve anything?
I don't agree with this, and I definitely don't think that Alan Moore agrees with it at all. I think he would point out - and arguably he does point out - that there's actually something kind of horrific about someone consistently sticking to a brutal and evil set of ethics. And there's something kind of horrific about Rorschach in exactly that sense - I mean, he's basically right next door to being a serial killer. So it's an interesting idea, but really not what the book is endorsing, I think.
And of course, Ozymandias follows the same logic in exactly the opposite direction - he tries to act for the greater good so much that he does this profoundly monstrous thing. So both extremes of the scale are, in a sense, equally condemned by Moore - which points to the idea that it's a negation, not an inversion, of the superhero genre.
ManWatchmen rules I need to reread it
no subject
So, if you consider both Ozzy and Rory to be duel villian on each end of the scale, would that mean that the hero is the character who is the least driven? Would that make Manhattan the hero? being the center point to the extremists? It fits, being the only one with super powers in a story that's twisting the SUPER hero genre.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-24 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)The one character I haven't really thought through is Laurie, and I don't remember exactly the tone of her ending off the top of my head, so I don't want to make any definitive statement there about that. But in general, I don't think any of the characters in Watchmen succeed in heroic terms.