case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-06-27 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3828 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3828 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #548.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-06-28 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
It still can't in any logical sense be equated to slavery. At all.

(Anonymous) 2017-06-28 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
I agree that it can't be equated to slavery. I don't think that anon who said "claim ownership of black people" was even equating it to slavery. What the argument from the actual letter said is that "The language of anti-black racism is often couched in terms of infantilization and ownership" which I think is true.

(Anonymous) 2017-06-28 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
Even so when people apply the same terms equally to characters of all races, this is just normalizing the idea of fans loving black characters. There's no reason to use entirely different language based on race.