case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-06-28 06:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #3829 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3829 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #548.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ninety6tears: jim w/ red bground (thor)

[personal profile] ninety6tears 2017-06-29 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
I've assumed there are still BAD examples of that kind of TV, but then, I don't remember the last time I watched a new episode of a procedural TV series so I guess I wouldn't know.

Rewatching TNG last year made me rethink whether I really prefer the cinematic style over more self-contained narratives, because arguably if CSI was written as well as some of the best Star Trek I could get into it. I would say both formats have their own challenges but I think we're reaching a tipping point where the notion of making a TV season more like an extended movie is really critically misleading. I love a show to take its time when it's deserved, but I think we're mistaking cinematic for substantial and forgetting that writing a series is its own dying art, I guess.