case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-06-29 06:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #3830 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3830 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Drake Bell and Josh Peck from Drake & Josh]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Death in Paradise, Ardal O'Hanlon]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dreamwidth Roleplay]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Final Fantasy X & X-2]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Outlander]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Animal Crossing/Legend of Zelda]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Daredevil TV]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #548.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
That was my thought, too, but OP didn't address that for some reason. He comes from an era where homosexuality is NOT accepted, and he also has related emotional trauma. Lord John is awesome - I love him - and yes, there are lots of times that Jamie is an absolute ass to him. But it makes sense in context of the story.

What's puzzling me, is that OP seems to want to keep that characterization (doesn't want it whitewashed), but then in the last paragraph also seems to be arguing against that characterization. So I'm actually not sure what the secret is saying...? Maybe I'm misreading it.