[ SECRET POST #3831 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3831 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________






















08. [SPOILERS for OITNB SEASON 5]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Wonder Woman]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for OITNB]
[WARNING for torture]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #548.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The anon I was replying to said "they could have made a different casting choice that might have worked better". They didn't say "looked better." "Worked better" would include the acting component, not just the looks.

[(Anonymous)]

That's a reach and I think you know it.

[(Anonymous)]

No, I don't. I took the anon's comment that I was responding to as saying someone else could both have played the part better than Gal and looked more fitting for the role. I disagree.

[(Anonymous)]

da- well you were told now, so you know it.

[(Anonymous)]

I was that anon. Personally, I loved the movie and I think she ended up doing a great job. What I meant was, that at the time, given that all they had was her audition, they could have made a different choice and gone with someone who looked the part. Hindsight is great and all. But that doesn't change the fact that casting a skinny model as an amazon shows the priorities of Hollywood and of the people at WB.

[virtual_lips]

You're very clearly ignoring the contextual clues from the rest of the statement, and general conversation, in favor of your strawman.