case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-02 02:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3833 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3833 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
What

Are you not aware people who say that exist and overlap hugely with pretentious people who are proud of themselves being A Reader unlike those Non Readers? Like, it's not a big leap that these are the same kinds of people OP and anon are talking about

Nobody said anything about anything happening all the time on here

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah thats what i was getting at, people who think they're intellectuals because they read but lol if they're reading in fandom what they're actually reading is bound to be mostly shipping and smut purely because well literally statistically that is most fic

which is perfectly FINE who cares if its mostly shipping and smut, but acting pretentious and better than others over "reading" when considering the material that makes up most of the reading is lolable

i guess i hit a nerve with anon

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

"Nobody said anything about anything happening all the time on here"

Does prefacing your comment with "in b4" no longer imply that you believe you're posting in the thread right before others respond in a predictable way?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
it means it expects at least one person to bring this up, not that 100 people immediately will

you are so defensive about this bro chillax

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm an entirely different anon. Not everyone who questions your behavior is being defensive. I'm not sure why you're trying to hard to start this wank.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, my bad then. i thought you were the same person being very angry about this for some reason

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I would put a large gap between something that says "in b4 wank" on like, a secret about social justice or sth and "IT HAPpENNS ALL ThE tIME ON heRE!1!"

I read it like anon expects the topic to be brought up? It didn't surprise me because I do recall a few responses in some Dating Dealbreakers threads where people did say they couldn't date someone who didn't read or have reading as a hobby and this secret reminded me of that, so it could be anon had the same thought

I'm not invested enough in this thread to go digging up links as proof, though

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Team no one, tbh.