Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-07-02 02:33 pm
[ SECRET POST #3833 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3833 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)Gen fic, 12k words
Ao3 - Hits: 647 Kudos: 48 Comment Threads: 11
FF.net - Reviews: 25 Views: 2,503
Because... wow. I would not have thought FF.net was still so active. I also like that ff.net's statistic pages make it easy to see and track hits. It's kind of comforting when I click on old stuff that hasn't gotten a new comment/fave in forever, but I can see that it's still getting a few daily hits.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 12:22 am (UTC)(link)As a writer, there is simply no contest in ease of uploading a story.
I tried to crosspost to ff.net a couple of weeks ago, and the hair-pulling frustration caused by their balky system was stunning.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)but you're right, I'm not responding to the OP, who I'm sure is a lovely person. More the crazed FF.net partisans who respond that way to every discussion about FFnet and AO3 on here.
(and yes, it's just as silly to say that FF.net is worthless)
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)Kinda makes it worse, IMO. You were trying to start shit before you knew there was any shit to start.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 03:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)Oh, it fit so well with the comment above I thought it was a misfire, lol
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)So I was mostly just curious as to if other people noticed there being some things that were significantly more popular on one platform than the other, or other quirks. Like I seem to get more comments on older fic on Ao3, but while I get more overall on ff.net they tend to all happen in the first 24 hours after posting something and after that it's very unlikely I'll ever get another comment on it. Ao3 they tend to trickle in over time.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)I genuinely snort-laughed my drink, thank you.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)Hasn't FF.net changed a lot since then?
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
Example:
Genfic, 3.9k
Ao3: Hits - 19,811. Kudos - 1701. Comments - 80. Bookmarks - 466
FF.net: Hits - 8,529. Comments - 99. Bookmarks - 541.
Despite the fact that the fic has WAY less views on ff.net, the number of comments is higher than Ao3.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
I'd have to do a much closer read to see if there's really a qualitative difference there, and how big of a difference it is.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 03:16 am (UTC)(link)This has been my experience of the two sites as well.
Re: FF vs. Ao3 Stats
(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)