case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-02 02:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3833 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3833 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I mean. A lot of people will look at characters who show trademark symptoms if they're not extreme enough and be like "omg you guys they're just quirky". They only get recognized if they're severe or someone in story suggests it or talks about it.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it's not a question of "recognition", it's a question of interpretation, surely. There isn't one correct answer, unless a character is specifically represented to be something in the text itself. Most of this is grey areas and interpretation and how you choose to look at it.

I completely get why The Discourse around those headcanons would be frustrating as shit, though

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
true. I guess I shouldn't be so assuming.

I mean I'm of the opinion that forcing headacanons is stupid and you shouldn't expect people to share your headcanon. I just wish people didn't get so annoyed at people for having them.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Completely and totally agree! You're right on there.