case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-02 02:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3833 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3833 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Inspired by #1

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Discworld. It is the best, par excellence; despite a few nerds doing their best to try and cast dirt on Pratchett's works to gain some beardy rebel points.

Works I wanted to get into, but couldn't. John Scalzi's Old Man's War books. There is just something about his writing style that I can't get.

Then there are Chuck Wendig's Star Wars books, which are just so bad I'd rather read Chuck Tingle's Pounded in the Butt by a Snub Fighter and a Smuggler.

Re: Inspired by #1

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Discworld. <3

Yeah, I hear you re: Scalzi's work. I find his blogging entertaining, but his writing style is very... I dunno. It's quite plain, with very little description and IIRC rather dialogue heavy. Not that this is bad, per se, but it's not my cup of tea. I like richer world building and lots of details. My other issue is that a lot of his characters sound alike - they speak with the same sarcastic jokey style... which I actually LIKE and find funny, but there's not much variation between characters' personalities.