case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-02 02:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3833 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3833 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not if we're talking about people acting all high and mighty because they ~love to read~ and scoff at another form of mass entertainment like TV as something "lesser" when in reality, a lot of the works people primarily read nowadays weren't actually meant to be read but instead to be performed as entertainment in a way not unlike movies or TV today.

Sure. I have no objection to calling those people dickbags, cause they are dickbags. I just think it gives a little too much credence to the underlying framework of high and low art as essential categories, even if it's reversing their values.
fishnchips: (Default)

[personal profile] fishnchips 2017-07-04 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
Fair enough.