[ SECRET POST #3834 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3834 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I would assume that someone who was engaged in making the argument for Dean being gay would make some other positive substantive evidence about why they think that, and why he would claim to be straight. I'm not trying to make that argument myself, which is why I don't have any reasons. And, I mean, neither was the secret OP.


When people argue about canon, what they're doing is trying to establish the validity, soundness, and probability of their interpretation of canon over other interpretations. When someone argues that Dean is canonically straight, they are arguing that their interpretation is valid, sound, supported by the text, and highly probable to continue being supported by the text throughout its canonical run.

I moooostly agree with what you're saying here. I think the one thing I would say is that I think the concept of "canon" is kind of an overly restrictive view of things. I don't think it's necessarily useful to focus on the idea of one single correct interpretation of the text, centered around giving a true and accurate account of the literal happenings within the narrative. You can have multiple conflicting interpretations of a text, which are equally plausible and useful and productive, and that's an OK thing to happen. Dividing interpretations into the framework of canon / headcanon is not necessarily a useful way to approach something like this.

I recognize that someone arguing that Dean is canonically gay isn't necessarily doing that kind of a thing, and also that you're not necessarily saying that canon is the only thing, or anything. That's just how I happen to think about it.