case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-05 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #3836 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3836 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: How are you personally problematic?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-05 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
It wouldn't matter if you were a non-straight woman. Looks are just as important to women, even us queer women who are supposed to be perfect and free of the patriatrchal heteronormative obsession with looks.
greghousesgf: (Hugh Blue Eyes)

Re: How are you personally problematic?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2017-07-05 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
then why do so many lesbians try to pick me up?
kallanda_lee: (Default)

Re: How are you personally problematic?

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2017-07-05 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe you're not actually unattractive, just not very femme in the way a lot of straight women are?
thewakokid: (Default)

Re: How are you personally problematic?

[personal profile] thewakokid 2017-07-06 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
This seem s logical to me. I know a few clam-fanciers and there is definitely a degree of shallowness comparable to my own.

I strongly suspect if ladies are after Ms House, its probably not because she's unattractive.