case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-22 04:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #3853 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3853 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Numbers are useful because they help quantify how meaningful those experiences are, and how central those people are to the alt-right as a general movement. Whereas anecdotal experience is not generally that meaningful, because it's isolated and small in number. If the number of people who are non-white in the alt-right movement is very small, they're probably not central to the movement or to defining the movement, and therefore not a good argument against the idea that the alt-right is racist.

And, I mean, this is not something that is specific to this particular instance. You want to get a sense of the magnitude of something before you can usefully talk about how significant it is. Very small numbers of people doing things are usually not very representative or significant. Very small numbers of people behave in unusual ways all the time without it being meaningful.