case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-27 07:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #3858 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3858 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

nayrt

(Anonymous) 2017-07-28 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
While I think that being willing to engage critically with the media you consume is a good thing, call-out culture an randos on the internet deciding that they are the moral arbiters of fandom are kind of the opposite of a good way to get people to do that.

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2017-07-28 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. Engaging critically is things like questioning the framing that Wonder Woman lived for a very long time with demigod Amazons, but needed a man to come in and teach her how to really be a hero. Vs. pointing out that traditionally the love interest only showing up to assist the hero in his personal growth is a derided role and it was very important that Wonder Woman actually change and grow as a character.

It's also going "Millions of kids learn about Greek/Roman mythology without running out and having sex with their relatives. Calm thy tits."