case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-28 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #3859 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3859 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Twin Peaks Season 3]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. http://i.imgur.com/36jpHpw.jpg
[Marco Polo, warning for (TV) nudity/sex]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of self-harm]

[American Gods (Starz)]


__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of incest]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of abuse, sexual assault]

(Dumbing of Age, Billie and Ruth)














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
To virtue signal saying you are for or again something, not because your moral compass points in that direction, but because you risk social chastisement if you don't.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Against. Not again.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
NA

It's not - speaking in the interests of people learning to be kinder - a term I find thoroughly useful. Because I don't think the people who are the worst, the ones that sound like they wandered out of 1984, quite see it that way.

Because, well, I've been that angry before? (Christ, I was a stressed out teen and young adult.) And when I was like that, that judgemental, spiralling into the anger like a bad case of depression and as short-sighted - I didn't think of it as using in-group terms or language policing. I was just that angry, that every little detail was something I zeroed in on and got angrier by, every action people took I just naturally assumed was done in the worst possible faith. And someone telling me I was doing this to fit in with a peer group would just have made me angrier, because I would not have considered it true - it would just have felt like another attack. And it wouldn't have encouraged me to stop.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I mean, the whole argument of virtue signalling operates on the logic that people are insincere and don't actually believe what they mean

this is demonstrably not the case