case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-28 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #3859 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3859 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Twin Peaks Season 3]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. http://i.imgur.com/36jpHpw.jpg
[Marco Polo, warning for (TV) nudity/sex]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of self-harm]

[American Gods (Starz)]


__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of incest]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of abuse, sexual assault]

(Dumbing of Age, Billie and Ruth)














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
You are mixing words here, that's not what SJW means, anon. A SJW is the person who doxxes you for shipping a 16 year old with a 20 year old because that's literally pedophilia and you're disgusting and deserve to have your life ruined for shipping two fictional characters.

If they are looking into issuess but are not overreacting, don't act like rabbid dogs and are not harrasing anyone, they aren't SJWs.

I think this example is great: The difference between a SJW and an activist: An activist tries to get a ramp added to a building for easier wheelchair access. The SJW tries to get the stairs removed because they might offend people who can't use them.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
That's a great comparison. Source?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
It is extremely hard to maintain that distinction when you're railing against the evils of SJWs, and when you can't stop railing against the constant perverse evils of SJWs every time the topic comes up

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
The fuck are you saying?
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2017-07-29 01:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Depends who you ask. There are people who would say someone who wants more LGBT characters/relationships in media are SJWs. Any media that does have LGBT characters are pandering to certain audiences and also SJWs.

The term is thrown around so much it's meaningless at this point.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
And those people are dumb at best malicious at worse.
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2017-08-01 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
As is everyone else who uses SJW as a legit insult.