case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-31 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #3862 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3862 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[FunkoPOP]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Power Rangers 2017, Erica Cerra]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Legend of Korra]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Peter Capaldi]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Gerard Way in "Ghost of You", Harry Styles in Dunkirk]

__________________________________________________



08.
[Fargo Season 3]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #553.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-01 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I actually collect some funkos so nice try. None of those are porny. They all are reflecting the art style of some form they have appeared in, hell the Harley Quinn one is literally her appearance in BTAS. And "double amputee" Wonder Woman is a bust. All this shows me is that you have zero idea of what your talking about and have never seen what real porny/wankbait statues are and if you find those offensive to the eyes then you aren't a comic fan and have no business criticizing people who collect them and getting morally superior over those that do.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2017-08-01 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
None of those are porny.

Let's see, overly exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics designed for sex appeal, combined with provocative poses? Yep, porny.

They all are reflecting the art style of some form they have appeared in, hell the Harley Quinn one is literally her appearance in BTAS.

So, cheesecake sculpture reflects the cheesecake sensibility of the print trash you collect?

And "double amputee" Wonder Woman is a bust.

A "bust" usually presents the figure from about the mid-sternum up. There's very few precedents for including the pelvis and amputated thighs.

All this shows me is that you have zero idea ... (bulshit bullshit bullshit) ... you aren't a comic fan ... (bulshit bullshit bulshit)

LOL. I have more than enough comics to know better. In fact, I have more than enough porn comics to know better. It doesn't mean that I'm going to decorate my house with T&A Harley or Tom of Finland Batman.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-01 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Blah blah blah more performative posturing about how you're more enlightened and moral superior than everyone else. You still clearly have no idea what real cheesecake figures are because at the end of the day: those aren't them.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2017-08-01 03:46 pm (UTC)(link)
performative posturing

Blowing those dogwhistles much?

Note that I didn't say that I'm morally superior, just less willing to pay $60 for overpriced and badly designed crap.

You still clearly have no idea what real cheesecake figures are because at the end of the day: those aren't them.

There's no way that Spider Gwen makes sense as a character or action pose. The only way it makes sense is if we follow the lead of the leering goblin in the wall.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-01 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't have to say anything. Your attitude and snobbery about how you aren't "stupid enough" to spend money on "porn" and calling people who like them "horny teenaged boys" says more than enough.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2017-08-01 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't use quote marks if you're paraphrasing (badly) rather than quoting.

And in fact, while I've been critiquing the genre of collectable comic book sculptures, you've offered nothing other than personal attacks on me as a person, so this conversation is done.
Edited 2017-08-01 16:19 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2017-08-01 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Lol kbai. Keep being upset over the fact that people just called funkos ugly and cheap and how you mounted your high horse to crusade about how much better you are over "porn statues."

(Anonymous) 2017-08-02 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
DA This thread was about the difference in prices before you came along with your secondhand embarrassment about porny figures. Come on, dude.