Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-08-18 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3880 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3880 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for discussion of child sexual abuse]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #555.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Modern ways of speaking online that annoy you
(Anonymous) 2017-08-19 06:32 am (UTC)(link)God, this! Mainly what I hate about it is that I feel like it lends itself way too easily to over-use. Words like "feud" or "attack" or even "criticism" and "dis" require that there actually BE a feud/attack/criticism/dis. Whereas "shade" is this thing that is so subjective and vague that you can literally just SAY someone "shaded" someone else and even when they didn't actually dis them in any way, it's hard to conclusively prove they didn't "throw shade." So now it's every celeb gossip site on the internet's favorite term, because all they have to do is use it in their heading and they've got instant clickbait. All it does is give their readers permission to believe some totally fabricated juicy celeb drama just went down.