case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-08-23 07:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #3885 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3885 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #555.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-24 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
There are two things we know to be true: the ship is fine because it's make-believe, and the ship squicks OP.

The thing that people are talking about is whether the ship does contain grooming and power differentials, or whether OP is being an unreasonable ninny. That's what I was responding to in my post. The response to OP's post was that the ship doesn't contain any power differentials or grooming and OP is crazy. I think that's jumping to conclusions. You're right to point out that it was imprecise of me to say "fine" when I meant "does not contain grooming or power differentials" which is what we're actually talking about here.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-24 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
I don't see anyone calling OP crazy.

I do see people questioning what qualifies as grooming and power differentials here, and understandably so, considering how broad those categories can be in fandom right now. Yes, sometimes unreasonably broad.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-24 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
The strong presumption is that OP is being ridiculous and overreacting.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-24 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Well, it's hard to believe that there's a fandom full of people who think that grooming children is totally fine.