case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-08-26 03:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3888 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: You're not special OP

(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 07:32 am (UTC)(link)
Sigh. The perspective that's missing or ambiguous isn't the victim's perspective. It's the author's perspective.

The author may be putting themselves in the victim's shoes and getting off, but the majority of readers wont share the author's perspective. They won't go "well, obviously I'm meant to experience this as a cathartic and arousing playing out of my rape fantasy, and I do!"

If you don't have a rape fantasy, a fic about character A raping underage character B is just a fic about an adult raping a kid. The perspective the author brings to the fic that makes the fic not horrifying and nauseating, is not shared by the majority of potential readers. All they see is a fic about an adult raping a kid.

Which is why the "people who write underage noncon are writing it from the perspective of the kid" arguement does not resolve the issue. Because the thing they've created is no less what it is just because they personally are getting off on the victim's experience and not the victimizers.

I can accept and respect that some people have fantasies of being raped. But that doesn't change how I feel about them posting hebephilic or pedophilic fanfic to public forums.

Re: You're not special OP

(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, but why seek out content that's explicitly been warned for when you have no interest in it? imo underage noncon has its place in fandom but that doesn't mean you or I need to interact with it. Just because you don't seem to, doesn't mean people consuming that content aren't fully aware of where it comes from.

Re: You're not special OP

(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 08:05 am (UTC)(link)
I've stumbled across quite a few simply because they weren't tagged appropriately. That said, correct tagging doesn't make me agree that kind of content should have a place on the major fanworks sites.