[ SECRET POST #3890 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3890 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Harry Potter and Pretty Little Liars]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Crown]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Me Before You (novel)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Little Women, Jo/Laurie, Jo/Professor Bhaer]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Supergirl, Wynonna Earp)


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Defenders]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Dirty Harry

[(Anonymous)]

Dirty Harry as presented on screen would be a bad person; as a character he is representative of a number of extremely bad, toxic ideas and cultural norms about policing and violence and authority and law in America. The movies are still watchable because they're just very effective action movies, and very stylish, but I don't think there's much that's redeemable about Dirty Harry as a figure.

And I wouldn't really see the point of making a remake or sequel. Just... why? What do you possibly have to add, offer, or gain?

Re: Dirty Harry

[thewakokid]

or gain

shekels my dude, shekels.

Re: Dirty Harry

[(Anonymous)]

Well I mean that doesn't really matter to me personally, I know it's not like they're asking for my permission. I don't see how a sequel or remake would be good, interesting, or worth watching. Put it that way.

Re: Dirty Harry

[thewakokid]

Same logic as the Death Wish remake, I suppose. New actor, modern setting, New audience. I'd probably give it a go. They'd need to do a damn sight better with the casting, tho.