case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-08-28 07:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #3890 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3890 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Harry Potter and Pretty Little Liars]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Crown]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Me Before You (novel)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Little Women, Jo/Laurie, Jo/Professor Bhaer]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Supergirl, Wynonna Earp)


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Defenders]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
leisuretime: (Default)

Re: "Implications"

[personal profile] leisuretime 2017-08-28 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
No obligation and I have a pretty broad benefit of the doubt gauge when judging implications. Sometimes it takes a lot of reaching and ignoring of common sense to latch onto an unfortunate implication. But that's not always the case, and when it comes to books and movies I definitely think better of the writers who address and clarify ambiguities that lead to those implications.

I give tv writers more leeway, just because their time constraints are so precise. Can't expect them to address every possible interpretation and still tell a good story.