[ SECRET POST #3890 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3890 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Harry Potter and Pretty Little Liars]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Crown]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Me Before You (novel)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Little Women, Jo/Laurie, Jo/Professor Bhaer]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Supergirl, Wynonna Earp)


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Defenders]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: "Implications"

[rosehiptea]

I think they are obligated to consider implications, and I'm not going to excuse people based on "well, gee, I had no idea" but there can definitely be cases where I feel the author made a good-faith effort and people are coming out of left field.

Also I generally draw the line at shipping. An author isn't obligated to put two characters together or make excuses for why they didn't put them together just because people thought they may have intended it. (There may be exceptions to this - I don't want to say "queer-baiting" never happens, for instance. But shippers can jump on things the author never intended and then get very bitter.)