Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-09-02 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #3895 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3895 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-02 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-02 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-02 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)but wtf, it is by definition queer. It is about two blokes fucking each other, it is queer, you can't say it isn't queer. there's nothing no homo about it. It's just as queer as any gay porn. The characters don't need to attend a rainbow-filled Pride Parade for it to be queer.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-02 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)it is by definition queer
it could be argued that it is the same level of "queer" as women having sex with each other in mainstream porn.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-02 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)Frankly, two women having sex with each other in mainstream porn is still two women having sex with each other in mainstream porn, and therefore also gay. You can argue that the actresses aren't gay, but in fiction, there's obviously no such disclaimer. The characters are legitimately in love and in a relationship.
Anyway, why does the relationship that fiction has with the audience define whether or not it is queer? Ficton should be able to stand on its own. It's not exactly subtle when you have two same-sex people in a romantic and sexual relationship; it's literally a matter of definition.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-02 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)Generally, probably that thing about objectifying/fetishizing someone's sexual orientation in fiction, while having no interest in improving conditions for living, breathing people who face violence and discrimination because of their sexual orientations.
Personally, it is watching works by female creators with a form and a content clearly geared at a female audience being praised to the high heavens by their female fans for being queer friendly for including m/m romances. It is TELLING that these stories either has no f/f pairings, or if they do, it is between minor characters that receive no-where the same attention.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-02 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)As I said, I'm a lesbian - I'm a woman who sleeps with women who has been at the brunt of homophobia on more than one occasion. And I agree it's annoying and even, yes, problematic, for straight people to think they are somehow ~gay friendly~ because they masturbate to same-sex porn. By all means, that's a discussion worth having.
But it doesn't mean BL isn't gay. It is, regardless of how stupid fans can be, it is still about gay relationships and gay sex.
Personally, I am so sick of "LGBT media" that is only about LGBT social movements, homophobia, rainbows, and pride parades. I have no interest in social justice media, tbh. But those elements are not what makes something queer. Only the queerness makes it queer.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-04 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)