[ SECRET POST #3895 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3895 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, you're one of those who tells other people what they do/would think.

I've actually noticed that a lot with the anti-SJW types - they're very big on telling anyone they don't agree with that "YOU think this, YOU think that." I've looked at some blogs like that, andso many of them argue that way.

[thewakokid]

Well, I'm just guessing based on you assuming and writing off the types of videos I watch as "type that rant about how everyone is a snowflake and "triggered?""

Like... Yeah, if you think that a video that would be of comfort to men is type that rant about how everyone is a snowflake and "triggered?" if that's the correlation you're making, then yeah you would, and infact sound like you already have gotten different things out of the types of videos I watch.

Maybe not, I suppose. I apologise.

Please, tell me what you were driving at with that comment?

[(Anonymous)]

Just that there are a lot of videos that characterise everyone they disagree with as "triggered." Which is funny to me because one does not need PTSD to disagree with someone.

I wasn't thinking that a video that "would be of comfort to men" was likely to be that type of video, but maybe one that would be of comfort to YOU (based on what I know of you as a named user who posts a lot).

[thewakokid]

Well, I mean, I was saying that I watch youtubers that make me feel better as a guy, liking the things I like, and you're assumption was that those videos "Are the type that rant about how everyone is a snowflake and "triggered?""

Like, you're arguing in pretty bad faith here, trying to say that the comment you were responding to was not something you were thinking about when you made the response.

like, I don't know if you think the insults are veiled, or if you're just hoping they're implied enough that you can claim to be making these comments in good faith, but really, it seems like you're trying to be a chore.

[(Anonymous)]

I wasn't trying to insult anyone?

I don't even know what "trying to be a chore" means.

I just had thought that you, personally (not men in general, since men aren't all you) were the type who'd like those kind of videos. Based on your posts here and the impression I've gotten of you as a person.

[thewakokid]

Seriously, it's not as veiled as you think it is.

To be a chore - To be a difficult person.

Well that's fine, but that right there is an assumption. I have told you I was watching something for reason X and you respond with a - lets be kind and say "Snarky" - snarky assessment of the kinda of things I watch. Then when I tell you that it's because you and me will have different take away - That was me arguing in good faith, by the way, assuming that you were genuinely saying that's what you believe X type videos are like, and not just you having a dig at me based on what you already think of me - you act like I'M the one making irrational assumptions?

Bah, why am I still talking to you.

[(Anonymous)]

Different OP.

I've noticed something about thewakokid. You just love arguing with people and just getting on people's nerves. The kind of guy who clearly doesn't understand certain aspects of the difficulty of negotiating the world as female and, judging by your comments, doesn't want to understand, but instead always bring it back to men, which is so typical a ploy of some kinds of men it's actually quite boring.You say you have a 'feminist girlfriend' who 'smells nice' (because that's the most important thing about having a partner, right? Forget their kindness, their loyalty, sense of humour etc) I honestly wonder, based on your comments, if you listen to a word that she says?

The fact is that the majority of online porn is designed with heterosexual men in mind (including "lesbian" porn). I've spoken with lesbians who laugh at how ridiculous porn that is obviously targeted at men does nothing for them. (They talk about long fingernails, for example, of the actors). Society, as a whole, is generally aimed at the sexuality of heterosexual men. Women are still very much shamed expressing all types of sexuality- including liking men-on-men. The 'madonna-whore complex' is very much present. Men being shamed for liking some form of porn isn't looking at the overall societal issue.

[(Anonymous)]

THIS. Thank you.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Honestly, reading your posts makes me wonder what you're dealing with, because you seem to have a lot of personal issues surrounding male sexuality. It almost seems like you could be ace-aro and not aware of the possibility, but that's something you need to decide for yourself.

[(Anonymous)]

I made an assumption about what kind of videos you might like based on the image you give off here. I also ASKED if those were the kind of videos you liked - I didn't TELL you you liked them. You outight told me what I'd think of them. I see a lot of people online telling people what they'd think, and I always have the impression that when someone does it to me I'm just supposed to go along with it. I don't know what I'd think of a video I haven't seen (assuming I haven't seen it).