[ SECRET POST #3896 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3896 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Me Before You (film/novel)]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Star Trek TOS]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Persona 5]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Andy Brennan and Lucy Moran from Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[David Bowie, "The Man Who Fell to Earth"]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Broadchurch]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: What stupid fandom stuff have you seen lately?

[(Anonymous)]

The most likely result of adding ~badass women~ to a mostly-male canon is that the women would just exist to be a suitable prize for the men. And the male characters' once-interesting character arcs would be consumed by cliched het romance. Wow, so many interesting possibilities!

I want more women in fiction too, but I hate when people think it makes you sexist if you don't love every shallow female character who meanders into the plot. Sexism plays a role in the lack of popularity of female characters, but the sexism is usually more on the creators' part than on the fans'. It's absurd to blame fans for not caring about female characters when, by and large, creators are sexist and produce female characters so poorly written that it's offensive.

Which makes it even more frustrating when the few actually well-written female characters are, as you said, reduced to being uwu badass queens. The people who profess to care the most about female characters are doing them a disservice.