case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-09-03 04:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #3896 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3896 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Me Before You (film/novel)]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Star Trek TOS]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Persona 5]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Andy Brennan and Lucy Moran from Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[David Bowie, "The Man Who Fell to Earth"]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Broadchurch]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Washington Post again

[personal profile] diet_poison 2017-09-04 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok, I mean, that's a whole nother discussion. I'm personally not a communist, but I know a lot of people who are, and they aren't authoritarians. (Some of them are but not the ones I'm friends with. We don't like authcoms lol.)

But the point is, firing back to "found the neo-Nazi" with "found the communist" is really really stupid because those two things aren't even close to morally equivalent or equivalent in terms of insults, and it kinda makes you look like a far-right-winger to even take that approach (a la "those damn commies!!").

Re: Washington Post again

(Anonymous) 2017-09-04 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, and that was kind of my point when I fired that back. Calling someone a Neo-Nazi just because they take the principle "I do not agree with the stupid, stupid shit you say, but I will defend to the death your right to be an ass in front of God and everyone" seriously is remarkably dumb on the face of it.

Also, yeah, Communism is horrible. It's lovely in theory, but it completely ignores human nature, always always always turns into authoritarianism, and ends up with millions of people dead and in Gulags.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Washington Post again

[personal profile] diet_poison 2017-09-05 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Being sympathetic to neo-Nazis tends to make other people side-eye you, and it's not a total non-sequitur - on the other hand calling the person who said that a communist is totally out of left field and not at all equivalent. You're arguing about the end results of large-scale communism and I don't disagree, but 1. being a communist doesn't mean you support authoritarianism, it just means you believe in a different economic model; being a neo-Nazi literally means you support genocide, so the comparison is completely fucking asinine and 2. not all communists support implementing it on a large scale, and as such I think your analysis of it misses a lot.

Re: Washington Post again

(Anonymous) 2017-09-05 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, for fuck's sake. I am not "sympathetic" to Neo-Nazis just because I think that, in America, they have the right to spout their stupid, stupid bullshit so the rest of us can point and laugh at them.

Maybe I should have said "Found the Stalinist" instead. Duly noted.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Washington Post again

[personal profile] diet_poison 2017-09-06 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
that still wouldn't make sense, but at least it's an insult.

nobody has threatened neo-Nazis' first amendment rights, so being really ardent about said rights as if they're under attack makes me roll my eyes at best. *shrug*
Edited 2017-09-06 14:03 (UTC)