case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-09-12 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #3905 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3905 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #559.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fannish behavior you can't stand.

(Anonymous) 2017-09-12 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Most fandom discussion over excessive sexualization ticks me off. Seems to either get weirdly puritan quick. IMO, the solution would be to have more stuffed that's unabashedly aimed at making women horny or stuff that's not about making anybody horny.

Funny how supposedly misogynist otaku stuff is way better about this than most western stuff outside romance novels.

Re: Fannish behavior you can't stand.

(Anonymous) 2017-09-12 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I think "excessive sexualiazation" isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it depends on where and when someone's sexualized. Like, in romance novels and porn that's kind of the point, but for example in action movies the women--well, woman, usually there's just the one--are put in sexually revealing outfits even when it would make it more difficult to do the same ass-kicking stuff the men do, and so on. Sexy is fine. Sexy where it breaks my suspension of disbelief or immersion is annoying.