fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3905 ]

[ SECRET POST #3905 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3905 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #559.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I see what you're saying, and I do agree, gays can be just as shitty to women as straights - in fact so can women, imo, so Chard's usually anthem of "BLAME MANADA!" always falls shockingly flat to me - but, and may Odin forgive me for siding with Chardster here, there is a much greater chance that a STRAIGHT male feminist is just trying to get his dick wet.

Of course there's also no guarantee that a lesbian is not equally playing a feminist to get clam so...

As to your point, I agree that the motivations behind shitty behaviour - be it hornyness from straights or dislike from gays - don't necessarily make that behaviour worst or better, I just mean that there is a difference. Which may or may not be what Chards saying here, but it's worth considering.

My problem with the "only straight men" narrative is that I know a ton of gay men who think they can get away with some of the grossest misogyny and still call themselves feminists because ~bitch I'm practically one of the girls~ and other annyoing reasons.

Agreed. But broadly speaking there is probably a difference in motivation if not necessarily a difference in how shitty it ends up being. Maybe splitting hairs, but it's fair to say straight are doing it for different reasons.

Of course there's also no guarantee that a lesbian is not equally playing a feminist to get clam so...

You're right, lesbians aren't women and never experience sexism

Edited 2017-09-17 02:12 (UTC)

What the fu...

How did you extrapolate "Lesbians aren't women and never experience sexism" from "there's also no guarantee that a lesbian is not equally playing a feminist to get clam so... "? Like... there's literally no cross over.

I mean if you want to boil down my comment to its basic, you'd come away with a comment saying lesbians are equally capable of deceit and don't necessarily identify as feminist by default.

Are you trying to saying that being a woman and experiencing sexism has to make you a feminist, and so the only conclusion you can draw from me saying a lesbian may necessarily be actually be a feminist is that I'm saying that lesbians do not fit that criteria that automatically makes you a feminist, I.e Being a woman and experiencing sexism?

I mean, there seems to be a major disconnect between what I said and how you're interpreting it.

Also, I really don't get the "Sssh, Rich" reference, but I'd really like to, if you care to explain?

I'm sure you'd love to live in a world where women don't care about this shit, wouldn't you? It's sad when you encounter some with self esteem and shit

So to be clear, you are saying that being a woman and experiencing sexism automatically makes you a feminist?

I really really don't get the "Rich" thing. seriously.

the more broad feminist terms use unexplained, the more confused i could get...

i can't....

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[ SECRET POST #3905 ]

Re: The more a (straight) guy tells you he's a feminist, the more likely he is to be shitty.

Re: The more a (straight) guy tells you he's a feminist, the more likely he is to be shitty.

Re: The more a (straight) guy tells you he's a feminist, the more likely he is to be shitty.

Sssh, Rich

Re: Sssh, Rich

You get it, dude.

Re: You get it, dude.

Re: Sssh, Rich