case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-09-21 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3914 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3914 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Smallville]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Riley, Julie's Greenroom]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Anne with an E]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Bojack Horseman]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Jeeves and Wooster, P.G. Wodehouse]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #560.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Everyone's nonbinary?

(Anonymous) 2017-09-21 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think cis and trans can be defined so rigidly as mental and social instead of physical. They all play a part this article either ignores or dismisses the physical dysphoria.

If you're a dude with boobs who feels like it's wrong that you have boobs, you'd probably still not want them even if everyone called them man boobs instead of boobs. Someone who identifies as non-binary may want to rid themselves of all outward physical markers of sex, and putting them in a green shirt doesn't really solve that problem. Saying they're not allowed to ID as NB because everyone is a little bit NB on the inside is ridiculous to me