Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-09-21 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3914 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3914 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[Smallville]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Riley, Julie's Greenroom]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Anne with an E]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Bojack Horseman]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Jeeves and Wooster, P.G. Wodehouse]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #560.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-09-22 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)But those concepts do exist, and they're part of the space within which we form our own individual identities. And the particular relationship that an individual person has to those broad and complex concepts can vary enormously. From person to person, how those broad ideas relate to who you are can be different. And for some people, the relationship that is most authentic and accurate to their lived experience is to say that their identity does not fit within either binary gender category - no matter how broad and accommodating those ideas about gender are. And I think that's sensible, and I don't see how it impinges on anyone else's identity at all.
What I don't get about your position is, what do you think gender *is*, that makes it impossible to have a non-binary identity?