case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-09-30 03:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #3923 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3923 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Close Your Eyes]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Brooklyn 99]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Daredevil, Vanessa Marianna/Wilson Fisk]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Good Omens, by Neil Gaiman]


__________________________________________________



06.
[A Wrinkle In Time, the forthcoming film]


__________________________________________________



07.
[FullMetal Alchemist]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #562.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
thewakokid: (Default)

[personal profile] thewakokid 2017-09-30 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I disagree. If a person can be considered sexy because of their hair colour or eye colour or their job (Uniform kink, for example) then them being sexy because they have one less arm is also fine imo.

I struggle with the idea of objectification as it's typically presented.

When a person is seen as ONLY a sex object and never as anything else, sure, objectification. But most the time it's when you EVER see someone as a sex "Object". Like I am capable of finding a person Utterly desirable because of any number of features... but still hate them as a person... and still consider their physical characteristics to be just excellent. Like I think we all "Objectify" other's. It's just a pert of being human that sometimes a persons physicality is the thing that strikes us the most at any one time. I reject the idea that that means all a person is, is an object without feelings to the objectifyer.

Like... Shit this is going to be a long comment... The argument I always had over classic Lara Croft: "Sure she's sexy. sure, sometimes That's all I need to like her some of the time, but that doesn't mean that's all there is to like about her, that doesn't mean that's all I do like about her, or that that's all I consider her value to be about. The idea that "She's sexy so that's all the value she has" is not an idea that comes from me."