case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-10-08 04:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #3931 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3931 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #563.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-10-09 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
But does "porn someone doesn't like" mean that it's porn that they, personally, don't find hot, or is it something that a reasonable person would find morally objectionable?

Being fandom, I tend to assume it's closer to the former; I've seen people complain about porn that didn't include "real" sex, aka penetration.

And considering how common it is for people to manufacture "moral" objections to ships they don't like (I'm looking at you, anti-Sheith people) I think that the odds are pretty low that their objections go anywhere near the "reasonable person" standard.