[ SECRET POST #3936 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3936 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________





















03. [SPOILERS for Alias Grace]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Don't Breathe]



__________________________________________________












05. [WARNING for discussion of dub/non-con]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of dub/non-con]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of self-harm]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #563.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Some important context, before the pitchforks.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes. I also wanted to provide more context.

In the first case, I wanted to provide context because I worry that if you just cite the reason that Twitter gave for their suspension of McGowan, peoples' natural reaction is to just not look into it anymore and say "Aha, that makes sense, I guess the whole Twitter boycott is just idiots overreacting as usual, damn SJWs".

In the second case, I wanted to make it clear that this wasn't a situation where McGowan was intentionally doxxing anyone, because I thought that was ambiguous.

Re: Some important context, before the pitchforks.

[(Anonymous)]

I see.

I said it above, but I meant the numbers could lead to doxxing, not that McGowan was calling for people to do it. I tried to get that across with the "possible" but it was confusingly phrased on my end.

Re: Some important context, before the pitchforks.

[(Anonymous)]

Sure, no worries, I think I kind of came off as more argumentative than I meant to as well.

Re: Some important context, before the pitchforks.

[(Anonymous)]

Haha, if it came off like I meant she was maliciously inviting people to doxx, I don't blame you!

Personally I don't think people are overreacting. I understand why they are angry. But I do also think Twitter was stuck between a rock - pissing everyone off - or a hard place - possibly being sued for letting a number stay up in a scandal getting millions of views - and took the logical company line of not being sued.

Re: Some important context, before the pitchforks.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Then why didn't Twitter suspend Lou Dobbs when he deliberately did something similar during the 2016 campaign against those who accused Trump of sexual assault?