case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-10-22 03:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #3945 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3945 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #565.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-10-22 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
The other anon gave examples: stuff like "REAL girls don't like working on cars EVER so therefor the character MUST be male."

A very common one is how clothing is not something that can be (but not necessarily is) about gender expression, but is an absolute proof of gender because wearing pants = a thing for guys, wearing skirts = a thing, and wearing both = genderfluid.

The moment gender is enclosed in such narrows ideas (aka that there's a right way to be a man/woman and anything that doesn't fit that mold someone isn't really a man/woman) and people actually believe it, there's something really wrong.