case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-11-09 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3963 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3963 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________













04. [SPOILERS for Stranger Things 2]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Stranger Things 2]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Stranger Things 2]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Great British Bake Off, S08E08: Forgotten Bakes]

[Stacey Hart in Great British Bake Off]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #567.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
rivia: (Default)

[personal profile] rivia 2017-11-10 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
when will media stop forcing love triangles into everything, WHEN?

also when will they ever actually have jonathan apologize for all that creepy stalking shit he did in s1 HRM i mean sure steve broke his camera for it but like was there an actual apology because i do not remember it.

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
And he deserved to have his camera broken for taking gross ass pics. He better be glad Steve is a better person than he is and bought him a new one.
rivia: (Default)

[personal profile] rivia 2017-11-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
oh god i dont mean that breaking the camera meant it should have been an over and done dropped issue, just that at least in the show's narrative they actually treat it like it was a fucked up thing to do but then... everyone forgot after a while? it was a year between seasons but i feel like that'd be important enough to mention if it were resolved off-screen...
Edited 2017-11-10 00:13 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
Nayrt

Ehhhhhh I feel comfortable assuming it was an off camera thing

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
I thought he apologized to Nancy when she came looking for the picture he took of Barb? I could be wrong, I haven't rewatched the beginning of season 1 for a while.
otakugal15: (Default)

[personal profile] otakugal15 2017-11-10 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
He did. This is just people being petty.

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
He did apologize, but he didn't need to. Nobody was supposed to have found the pictures, so him taking them wasn't any different than someone having a private fantasy about the person they like.

And the others didn't break his camera as some noble revenge for the "creepy" pictures. They just used that as an excuse to break the camera because they already hated him.

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Nobody was supposed to have found the pictures, so him taking them wasn't any different than someone having a private fantasy about the person they like.

Are you serious?

It's totally different. It's voyeurism. It's a violation of privacy. Whether or not they were supposed to know about it.

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
Dead serious. Voyeurism laws are stupid.

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
1) Are we talking about whether it's illegal (or should be illegal), or whether it's immoral?

2) What would you think of a situation where someone borrows money for personal use from their employer with every intention to pay it back before the employer finds out it's missing?

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 06:32 am (UTC)(link)
So are creepshots of underage girls ok for pedophiles to take, as long as "nobody was supposed to have found" them?

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I disagree that it was no different than someone having a private fantasy, but I also don't think it was nearly as creepy or messed up as some people want to make it out to be.

If he'd set out with the intention of taking pictures of Nancy taking her top off, that would have been really creepy. But he didn't. He didn't even set out to take pictures of any humans. He came across the pool party by accident and I don't blame him at all for taking (non-lascivious) pictures of the pool party. I do think he shouldn't have taken any pictures of Nancy in the window, and I'm glad he realized it was wrong and apologized for it in S1, but I think what he did was also extremely understandable and not actually that bad. He was already taking pictures, so I can completely understand how it would've seemed natural to keep taking pictures as the scene progressed. And then he actually did stop. He appeared to take only a couple pictures of Nancy in the window, one when she was just standing there and one of her back after she took her top off. And then he stopped. He shouldn't have taken either of those pictures, but he did make the choice to stop after that. It just took him a few seconds to switch from thinking like a photographer and weird outsider ("take pictures of every interesting thing you can see") to thinking like a regular person ("I'm spying on something it's wrong for me to be spying on.")

(Anonymous) 2017-11-10 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
when will they ever actually have jonathan apologize for all that creepy stalking shit he did in s1

I figure they covered that pretty adequately in S1 in the dark room scene:

Nancy: What was I saying?

Jonathan: What?

Nancy: When you took my picture?

Jonathan: I shouldn't have taken that. I know. I'm sorry.